Microsoft Passport Part One: User Experience
Okay, so after spending waaaay too much time reading all the documentation at the official Passport site, I’ve been able to glean a little info on how the end-user will approach this technology.
This analysis is necessarily focused on the Wallet component of Passport, because this component (1) doesn’t require NT Server’s IIS, which I don’t use, (2) can be referenced from any site through standard protocols, making its adoption much more likely to be pervasive, and (3) is closer to a release product. Enough intro, though, let’s see what we’ve got…
First, let’s address the goals, as I understand them:
Reduce duplicate data entry of personal information: Great one, very needed, and relatively well addressed. The only clear win with Passport.
Increase security of info: Another essential. Remains to be seen how well this one is handled, but Microsoft has a checkered history in this area, especially after the recent Hotmail CGI vulnerability.
Introduces consistent e-commerce interface: Mixed bag. Consistency between multiple commerce sites reduces consistency within an individual site, assuming sites have significantly different designs, as most do. (see below)
An unstated, but likely, goal: Increasing the number of sites using secure technologies for transactions and registration: Will very likely succeed in this area, but adoption rates are notoriously hard to predict on the web.
Increase user comfort: Remains to be seen. Seeing Microsoft’s name should comfort most users, except possibly Linux users. The strength/weakness of the system is that all Password sites reinforce each others’ images of security or vulnerability.
Whipping Out Your Passport
Let’s go deeper into this. The fundamental thing to know about Passport is that it’s a typical Microsoft web initiative, equal parts evangelism, assimilation, marketing, and technology. That being said, it also displays Microsoft’s usual knack for eventually resulting in end-user benefits by shamelessly pandering to developers.
Users (and in this context, I mean end-users on their web browsers at home on a dial-up) browse to your site. You’ve got your special features: a "Members Only" section with proprietary content, a little Shopping Cart e-boutique selling your logo gear, and your usual bevy of doodads, the site search, your homepage, the ugly slow page your client made you lard on despite your objections.
User X is new to your site, but desperately wants to see that New York Times-style "Registration Required" material. So they click on the standard Passport Sign In Icon on your page.
Your server talks to Microsoft’s, and they work out all the details. (More on the tech stuff tomorrow) We’re in luck! User X has a Hotmail account already, so they’re spared the ritual of registering for Passport. (Which isn’t very trying, anyway.)
X sees the "standard" Passport sign in screen, and this is where the trouble starts.
Coming up: an in-depth look at Microsoft Passport. Until I get all of that uploaded, take a look around their website and give me some feedback of your own.
Specifically, part one today will deal with user experience and part two tomorrow will describe the (rather ungainly) back-end technology that makes it work from the site manager’s perspective.
Note: Much of the information on the Passport site requires that you already have a passport, which you do if you have a Hotmail account.
While the list of sites using Passport right now is very short and limited to MSN sites, I’m expecting we’ll see more of this technology (and, presumably, the inevitable open-source alternative) all over the web soon. Stay tuned…