Useful Analogies 10 Feb 2004 2004-02-10 2004-02-10 tech, advertising, aesthetics, anthropology, antitrust, apache Now that we’re in the last few months of the Era of Pop-Ups on the web, I’m kind of curious what the annoying ad format means. I think pop-ups are distinct from... 1

Useful Analogies

Now that we’re in the last few months of the Era of Pop-Ups on the web, I’m kind of curious what the annoying ad format means. I think pop-ups are distinct from pop-unders; The ones appearing behind your browser seem more like a slime trail left by aggressive advertisers, whereas those first X10 ads always seemed somewhat more invasive.

It seems to me that pop-ups should be analogous to the tear-out cards in magazines, a form of promotion that calls attention to itself and is intrusive but somehow doesn’t seem to be against the "rules" of the medium. Yet everyone I speak to thinks pop-ups are damn near offensive and has no problem plucking all the tear-outs from a magazine or simply ignoring them while reading. Even accounting for the learning curve that some users will have just figuring out how to close these windows, there’s a visceral reaction that I find fascinating.

Why is our experience of pop-ups on the web qualitatively different than other forms of intrusive advertising?

Cite this post

APA
Dash, A. (2004, February 10). Useful Analogies. Anil Dash. https://anildash.com/2004/02/10/useful-analogie/
MLA
Dash, Anil. "Useful Analogies." Anil Dash, 10 Feb. 2004, anildash.com/2004/02/10/useful-analogie/. Accessed .
Chicago
Dash, Anil. "Useful Analogies." Anil Dash. February 10, 2004. Accessed . https://anildash.com/2004/02/10/useful-analogie/.